Which is the best pulse oximeter for home use?

Medically reviewed and edited by Tod Cooperman, M.D. Tod Cooperman, M.D.

Last Updated: 12/09/2021 | Initially Posted: 09/22/2020

Best Pulse Oximeter for Home Use -- Pulse Oximeter

Recent CL Answers

·         Can any supplements reduce or increase the risk of kidney stones?

·         Which deodorants and antiperspirants are contaminated with benzene and which are not?

·         6 Red Flags to Watch Out For When Buying Vitamins & Supplements

Answer:

Pulse oximeters, which simply clip onto your fingertip, are non-invasive devices that can measure blood oxygen saturation as well as pulse (heart rate). They are relatively inexpensive (about $20) and can be purchased for home ("non-medical") use.

Although they are not as accurate as FDA-approved "medical" pulse oximeters, which cost much more and undergo more rigorous testing, comparison studies indicate that some (but not all) non-medical pulse oximeters can help signal when medical attention is needed in conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is also evidence that non-medical pulse oximeters may improve clinical outcomes in patients at high risk of severe COVID-19, as was shown in a retrospective analysis of insurance records from more than 38,000 high-risk COVID-19 patients in South Africa. Those who had been given a pulse oximeter for home monitoring after COVID-19 diagnosis had a 48% lower likelihood of death within 60 days of laboratory confirmation of infection compared to those not given a pulse oximeter. Pulse oximeter readings were recorded twice daily. If the readings fell to 90% to 94%, patients were advised to call their doctor, and if the reading fell to below 90%, patients were advised to go to an emergency room. The researchers attributed the mortality benefit to the fact that those in the pulse oximeter group probably sought medical attention sooner. This theory was supported by lower levels of C-reactive protein (a marker of inflammation) in the pulse oximeter group upon hospital admission compared to the control group (Nematswerani, SSRN 2021 — preprint).

A study in England also showed that COVID-19 patients fared better with pulse oximeters. The study, which looked at medical records of 15,621 COVID-19 patients seen at emergency rooms but not requiring immediate hospital admission, found that those who received a pulse oximeter for home monitoring had a 52% lower likelihood of death within 28 days after laboratory confirmation of infection than those who did not receive a pulse oximeter. Interestingly, those given pulse oximeters were more likely to return the emergency department but less likely to be admitted to critical care, suggesting that home monitoring improved early detection of low blood oxygen saturation levels. Patients who participated in home monitoring were advised to take three readings per day and contact their primary care provider for readings of 93% to 95% or emergency services for readings of 92% or lower (Clarke, medRxiv 2021 -- preprint).

Best Home Pulse Oximeter

As nicely summarized in an article on MedPage Today by Dr. Anthony Pierson, a cardiologist, a model that has performed relatively well in studies is the Contec CMS50DL (or a similar model the Contec CMS50D, from Contec Medical Systems, China), currently sold on Amazon by a distributor (ClinicalGuard) for just $14.81. As Dr. Pierson points out in his article, the Contec CMS50DL has been shown to be fairly accurate at normal oxygen saturation levels above 90% but, like similar products, it may be less accurate below 90%. Nevertheless, based on the current evidence, the Contec CMS50DL is ConsumerLab'sTop Pick among pulse oximeters.

Keep in mind that direct-to-consumer pulse oximeters, including the Contec CMS50DL, do not meet requirements for FDA-clearance, and hospital-grade pulse oximeters such as the Philips Sensor Glove SpO
2 Monitor, have been shown to perform better in clinical testing. Nevertheless, the Contec CMS50DL has been shown in clinical testing to have overall accuracy of 91% (compared to 60% to 86% for most other tested devices), although, as noted above, it was more accurate at normal oxygen saturation levels than lower levels. It other words, this device performs better when used to rule out low blood oxygen rather than to confirm the condition. Normally, in healthy people, blood oxygen saturation should be in the high 90s. Measurement of less than 93% on a home device should prompt further investigation and management of hypoxia if necessary (Smith, SAMJ 2019Harskamp, BMJ Open Resp Res 2021).

Cautions when using a non-medical pulse oximeter at home

Be aware that some non-medical pulse oximeters have been shown to report normal values when true values were below 90%. This could be dangerous, as it might lead one to think that they do not require medical assistance when they actually do. In a study of six non-medical pulse oximeters, two products that exhibited this problem in one patient were Atlanteen SB100 II and Beijing Choice MD300C23 (
Lipnick, Anesth Analg 2016). Apps that claim to measure oxygen saturation using only a smartphone — such as DigiDoc and another provided by Samsung — should not be used as oximeters, as these devices have poor accuracy (Tarassenko, Oxford COVID-19 Evidence Service, 2020).

When using a pulse oximeter, be aware that it works by transmitting light through your fingertip. Factors that can affect reading accuracy include poor circulation, skin thickness, skin temperature (cold fingers), and current tobacco use (
FDA 2021). Anything that obstructs the light, such as fake nails or nail polish, can cause an error or false reading. In addition, pulse oximeters may give false readings in people with darker skin: Two large studies found that normal readings in people with oxygen saturation less than 88% (which is below normal) occurred almost three times as often in black people compared to white people (11.7% vs. 3.6%, respectively) (Sjoding, N Engl J Med 2020).

Additional issues that can affect readings, as noted in the 
user manual for the Contec CMS50DL device, are weak pulselow body temperaturemajor bleeding, and use of certain drugs (including staining drugs such as methylene blue or vasoconstricting drugs such as dopamine, procaine, prilocaine, lidocaine, and butacaine).

Among people with 
severe anemia and low blood oxygen levels, pulse oximeters may underestimate the amount of oxygen in the blood. Fortunately, this error may lead to more timely treatment. On the other hand, among people with normal blood oxygen levels, even severe anemia has no effect on pulse oximeter readings (Chan, Respir Med 2013). Consequently, pulse oximeters can't be as a tool to detect anemia.

To get the most accurate reading, the FDA recommends the following:

·         Follow the manufacturer's instructions for use.

·         When placing the oximeter on your finger, make sure your hand is warm, relaxed, and held below the level of the heart. Remove any fingernail polish on that finger. [Note: According to the WHO, the probe may be turned sideways to take a measurement from a finger with polish in emergency situations. However, removing polish or potentially using another site (such as a toe) is preferred.]

·         Sit still and do not move the part of your body where the pulse oximeter is located.

·         Wait a few seconds until the reading stops changing and displays one steady number.


The readings alone don't tell the whole story on how you are doing. As noted by the CDC, trouble breathing, persistent pain or pressure in the chest, new confusion, inability to wake or stay awake, and bluish lips or face are emergency warning signs that you should seek medical care immediately. At best, these devices can provide another warning sign -- that oxygen levels are low, but they should not be relied upon for accurate measurements.

6 Comments

Top of Form

                                      

Bottom of Form

Jeanne23159

August 11, 2021

As an RN, I have had good luck with turning the machine over and reading through the finger pad if a person had on fake nails or polish. If someone is extremely obese, this could be problematic, but I have tried it both ways on people with normal nails, as a little test, and got the same readings. Sideways reading sounds quite awkward to me.

Sandra Collins

August 12, 2021

Thank you!!! I have gel nails and going on a trip. Did not want to remove them. The finger pad is a great idea

Reply to this post…

Jef21622

December 20, 2020

Pulse Ox differences for people of color have been noted going back to 1998. Shameful this hasn't been addressed or solved by now.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18048893/
https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/102/4/715/7364/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.111

Reply to this post…

Ted21501

December 2, 2020

We spend time in mountain cabins at high elevations (6000 - 10,000 feet) where the altitude causes a large drop in oxygen saturation. We need a meter that is accurate in the 80% to 90% range, and are willing to spend $100 - $200. Any suggestions?

William22466

April 21, 2021

Though I am a physician, I cannot claim expertise, but I am a pathologist who subspecializes in blood diseases and coagulation (hemato-pathology). When a person moves to high altitude, they develop higher blood counts, but most importantly, their oxygen carrying capacity of the blood increases. Especially important is that hemoglobin (the protein that carries oxygen inside red blood cells) has a "dissociation curve" that shifts, allowing the oxygen to more easily leave the hemoglobin and go into tissues. These changes allow the body's cells to get more oxygen to compensate for the lower amounts in the air at high altitude. These changes take time to develop, usually a matter of a couple of weeks, but begins to happen fairly quickly. With pulse oxymeters relying on the more "red" color of transmitted light, that shows only the amount of oxygen being carried in the blood, the effect on the numbers seen on a pulse oxymeter may, OR MAY NOT, be helpful in high altitude situations. A more knowledgeable person than I am may be able to answer that question better. The only thing that is certain is that a person who is developing lung dysfunction in a COVID-19 infection would be a much greater danger when travelling to high altitudes, and this would be less likely if the person has already been living at high altitudes for awhile.

Jeanne23160

August 11, 2021

Excellent information William! Thank you.

Reply to this post…

Show More Comments

Join the conversation

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Related CL Answers (17)